The tax pros and cons of benefits vs dividends
As an owner manager of a company, taking income from it in the most tax and NI-efficient way is probably near the top of your list. The general view is that dividends are the best option, but when might benefits in kind trump them?

Profit extraction
Benefits in kind are one of the three main methods for director shareholders to extract income from their company. Except in one situation (see The next step ), benefits are more tax/NI efficient than salary, but generally, though not always, less tax efficient than dividends.
Benefits have an advantage over dividends because a company can provide them to a director even if it is loss making. This makes them a useful alternative or addition to salary in the early years of a company’s trading when it may not have enough profits from which it can pay sufficient dividends to meet a director shareholder’s needs.
When are benefits more tax efficient?
Benefits are more tax efficient than dividends where they are exempt from tax and NI in the hands of the director shareholder (see The next step ). Not only is there no tax for the recipient to pay but the company receives a tax deduction for them. The following tables compare the overall tax positions of a company providing an exempt benefit in kind compared with a dividend of an equal value.
Company (£) | Director shareholder (£) | |
Benefit in kind | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Corporation tax (CT) relief at 19% | -190 | |
Net cost to company | 810 | |
Net value to director | 1,000 | |
Dividend | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Minimum director's income tax | -88 | |
Net cost to company | 1,000 | |
Net value to director | 912 |
The figures assume the company pays tax at the small profits rate of 19% and the whole dividend is taxed at the dividend basic rate. Both the director shareholder and the company are better off with a benefit in kind rather than a dividend. The tax savings would be even greater where the company pays CT at the main or marginal rate, or the director is a higher or additional rate taxpayer.
When are benefits less tax efficient?
Generally, benefits which are taxable and liable to NI are less tax efficient than a dividend of the same value as the table below shows. However, where special rules apply for working out the taxable benefit resulting in a low taxable amount, e.g. zero or low emissions company cars, a benefit in kind might still edge a dividend for tax efficiency.
Company (£) | Director shareholder (£) | |
Benefit in kind | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Class 1A NI (13.8%) | 138 | |
Corporation tax relief (19% ) | -216 | |
Director-shareholder’s income tax | -200 | |
Net cost to company | 922 | |
Net value to director | 800 | |
Dividend | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Director's income tax | -88 | |
Net cost to company | 1,000 | |
Net value to director | 912 |
Related Topics
-
VAT-saving opportunity with changes to the CGS?
The government has announced that it will increase the capital goods scheme (CGS) threshold for capital expenditure on land and buildings from its current level of £250,000. What will the new threshold be, and how can you take advantage?
-
Delay salary to save tax
As a company owner manager, you decide when to take income from your business. If that’s your only source of income, tax planning is relatively simple but it’s trickier if you have other sources. What’s the best strategy to improve tax efficiency?
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?